The Socialist Menace Piercing the corporate veil of deception

31Dec/110

US threatens war with Iran

An Iranian navy military exercise

Media propaganda can be a powerful tool for distorting history, as well as distorting current political events.

Shortly before the United States entered World War II, for example, it placed an embargo on Japan, blocking its access to goods like steel and oil.  These things were critical to its economy, and as a small island nation, it depended heavily on imports.  The Roosevelt administration knew the overwhelmingly likely effect of this embargo would be Japanese retaliation - and sure enough, the move forced Japan into attacking the U.S. at Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941.  The U.S. media has long portrayed America as the victim of totally unwarranted Japanese aggression, but the truth is, the U.S. provoked Japan into attacking and knew exactly what it was doing.

Similar events are taking place with respect to Tehran today.  While the media would have us believe that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the President of Iran, is a madman and dictator, bent on acquiring nuclear weapons and "wiping Israel off the map," there is more to the story than this absurdly pro-U.S. account.

Both the United States and its allies, as well as the UN Security Council, have previously imposed sanctions on Iran over its alleged nuclear weapons program, which have significantly harmed its economy.  Tehran denies that it is developing nuclear weapons.

President Obama will soon sign into law restrictions on Iran's central bank, through which most Iranian oil sales flow.  Specifically, it would freeze assets of any foreign financial institutions doing business with the bank, which would have the effect of severely impeding Iranian oil exports.  Meanwhile, the European Union is considering placing an embargo on exports of Iranian oil.

Sound familiar?

It's no surprise that, in response, Iran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz.  Having been sufficiently provoked and attacked economically, Iran is lashing out at the true aggressors - the U.S. and its allies.  However, the American media has unleashed a barrage of propaganda, making it appear that Iran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz is totally unwarranted.

The U.S. Department of Defense issued a statement saying that this would "not be tolerated," an implied threat of military action.

As the Obama administration deliberately heightens tensions with Iran, arguing that a nuclear Iran is unacceptable, bear in mind that the U.S. deliberately manufactured lies about Saddam Hussein building WMDs in Iraq in 2003.  It makes no difference whether Iran is actually building nuclear weapons - the U.S. has its own strategic reasons for justifying a war with the country, including its huge oil and gas reserves.

9Dec/110

Obama blocks morning-after pill for minors

Plan B: The Morning-After Pill

The Food & Drug Administration (FDA), following medical experts' recommendations, was all set to remove the Bush-era restriction on the emergency contraceptive, Plan B (often referred to as the morning-after pill).  Then, on December 7, the Obama administration interfered.  The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), Kathleen Sebelius, overruled the recommendation to remove the age restriction.  This is the first time in history an HHS Secretary has overruled the FDA.

Use of Plan B is time-sensitive (hence the name, morning-after pill), and physicians are often unavailable on such short notice to write a prescription.  Thus, this move will effectively deny access to the contraceptive for minors.

This is outrageous on two levels.  First, there are the extreme cases, such as rape or incest.  If a 15-year old girl is raped, she will be unable to buy the morning-after pill without a prescription - and by the time she gets a prescription, it will likely be too late.

The outlier situations of rape and incest, of course, are the easier cases to make; many Republicans might even agree that these should be valid exceptions.  However, a broader (and more controversial) principle is at stake here:  access to birth control for all girls of every age.

The girls who are most in need of contraceptives or abortion procedures are the most vulnerable ones in society - young women, who are not old enough to be capable of raising a child, and poor women, who do not have the financial resources to raise a child.  Women who are older or more affluent will not be nearly as devastated by an unintended pregnancy.  Contraceptives may be helpful or convenient for the latter group, but they are absolutely vital as a basic human right for minors.  An unintended pregnancy can condemn a girl to poverty, placing enormous burdens on her and severely pressuring her to give up any hope of a more productive and prosperous future.

The Obama administration has deliberately blocked girls under 17 from obtaining Plan B without a prescription, once again eroding a critical civil liberty.  The consequences of this action will be catastrophic for innumerable young women.

30Oct/110

Egyptians show solidarity with Occupy Wall Street, including Oakland

"Obama & Tantawi R 1"

I hear a lot of people wondering what the protesters are so angry about in the Occupy Wall Street movements throughout America and worldwide.  In a recent NY Times editorial, Thomas Friedman gives an example of something outrageous that Citibank did that eventually caused it to pay a $285 million settlement:

"[W]ith one hand, Citibank sold a package of toxic mortgage-backed securities to unsuspecting customers — securities that it knew were likely to go bust — and, with the other hand, shorted the same securities — that is, bet millions of dollars that they would go bust... It doesn’t get any more immoral than this."

"From #tahrir to #occupyoakland and #USA"

Eventually, Citi settled the case for $285 million, without admitting that it did anything wrong.   The bankers were never individually punished at all - if anything, they were rewarded.  And this was the situation that took place over and over again at many banks and other financial institutions that make up the metaphorical "Wall Street" of modern America.

No wonder people are furious.

The Occupy protests have spread not only across the country but throughout the globe.  In Cairo, protesters were showing solidarity with Americans, particularly after the incident in Oakland when an Iraq war veteran was struck in the head by police, fracturing his skull.  These were not isolated protesters expressing unity; many different signs were on display.  One read "Obama & Tantawi R 1 Hand in beating the protesters in #tahrir #occupyoakland."  Tantawi is the nominal head of the military government, or junta, currently ruling Egypt with all the tyranny of Mubarak.

"from Egypt to Wall Street"

Another sign reads "From #tahrir to #occupyoakland and #USA one case, one goal #socialjusticeforall, fuck police."  The hashtags, of course, are borrowed from Twitter, which has proven to be an invaluable tool in helping protesters organize across the Middle East during the "Arab Spring."

"From Egypt to Wall Street," another sign proclaims in broken English, "don't afraid.  Go ahead #occupyoakland #OWS."

Workers are increasingly aware of their ties across national borders; the international working class is struggling against the capitalist system with growing ferocity.  This is setting the stage for revolution, something that the ruling class in all nations will attempt to brutally repress.

20Oct/110

Gaddafi killed, Libyans enter new era

Libyan officials reported that Colonel Gaddafi has been killed after months of fighting as he attempted, without success, to put down a revolution in his country.  This marks a new epoch in Libyan history.

The announcement comes from Mahmoud Shammam, the chief spokesman of the Transitional National Council, which is the interim government that replaced Gaddafi’s regime after he fled Tripoli in late August.

Shammam noted, "We were serious about giving him a fair trial.  It seems God has some other wish."

Libya joins the noble ranks of England, France, Russia, and - very recently - Tunisia and Egypt, among other nations, in deposing a corrupt and aristocratic ruler, laying the groundwork for (potentially) a new and more democratic society.

The "Arab Spring" actually has a great deal in common with the workers' struggles earlier this year in Wisconsin and the Occupy Wall Street movement currently  spreading across the US.  It remains to be seen, however, whether any of them will remain independent, or whether they will be co-opted by reactionary powers and repressed.  In America, this is the Democratic Party's role:  channeling popular anger into the mainstream political system, ensuring that it's kept under control and doesn't develop into a a truly independent movement against the establishment.

This can also be seen in Egypt, where a anti-democratic military junta has taken power, crushing any possibility of dramatic reform or radical progress.  Unless the Egyptian people remain vigilant and overthrow the junta, they will face the same situation as under Mubarak.  In Libya, as in Egypt, the working people must be wary of those who hold power, and must continue the struggle for permanent revolution.

7Oct/110

Steve Jobs was no Thomas Edison

Steve Jobs

In the aftermath of Steve Jobs' tragic death, the news has been filled with eulogies for the Apple CEO.  Media outlets have repeatedly compared him to Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, and other "great American leaders."  For example:

Apple founder Steve Jobs modern day Edison

Was Jobs an Edison for our time?

Steve Jobs - The Loss of the Thomas Edison of our Time

And so on; just google Steve Jobs and Edison.

With all due respect, Jobs is not exactly on par with someone like Thomas Edison.  Jobs, along with Steve Wozniak, founded Apple and created the first successful personal computer with a graphical interface.  He eventually left Apple but later returned, creating and popularizing the iMac desktop computer, the iPod mp3 player, the iPhone, and the iPad, among other things.  He is rightly praised for being an innovative visionary, gifted at design and creating not mere products but a whole new set of "experiences" for users.

But at its core, Jobs basically just took already-existing technology and repackaged it in creative ways.  It's not like the personal computer didn't exist before he created the Apple or Apple II - it was just not as user-friendly.  The iPod is just a small, portable hard drive with headphones.  The iPhone simply combined mp3 players and cell phones in an appealing package.  And we had tablets before the iPad existed.

This is a far cry from someone like Thomas Edison, who had over 1,000 patents in a wide range of fields.  Here's a list of just some of the shit Edison invented:

  • the light bulb (what were they using before this, candles?  gas lamps?  let's get serious)
  • the motion picture
  • the phonograph (before Edison invented this, there was no conceivable way to record and play back a voice, music, or any sound at all)
  • the talking motion picture (not a big leap once you've already single-handedly invented movies plus recording sound)
  • the centralized power plant
  • the battery

He also discovered what is known as the "Edison effect" in science (known today as 'thermionic emission'), which involves the flow of electrons from a heated element to a cooler metal plate.  This led to the invention of the vacuum tube and actually provides the foundation for virtually all modern electronics.

Steve Jobs was a visionary and fantastic entrepreneur, designer and marketer.  But without Jobs or Apple, we would still have PCs, cell phones, laptops and notebook computers, mp3 players, and so on.  Things would be different, but not dramatically different.  In stark contrast, in a world without Edison, there'd be no indoor lighting, no electricity as we know it, no batteries, no movies or sound recordings, no television, no computers...

Edison is just in a league of his own.

24Sep/110

Wealth inequality in America

Larry Ellison, Bill Gates, and Warren Buffett

One problem with the so-called "free market" is that it produces severe and increasing inequality between the rich and the poor.  Earlier this week, on Wednesday, Forbes published its annual list of the 400 richest Americans for 2011.  Their combined net worth has grown (of course) to $1.53 trillion, an astounding increase of 12 percent over last year given the state of the economy.  The top 5 in the list were:

  1. Bill Gates, $59 billion (up from $54 billion last year)
  2. Warren Buffett, $39 billion
  3. Larry Ellison, $33 billion
  4. Charles Koch, $25 billion
  5. David Koch, $25 billion

George Soros and two members of the Walton family are also in the top 10, with fortunes of over $20 billion each.

To even make it into the top 400, each person had to have a net worth of $1.05 billion.  This is over ten thousand times the median net worth of American households.

Not surprisingly, the single most common occupation of people on this list is "investor" - meaning they produce nothing of value for society but simply speculate in financial markets.  Only 4 were in manufacturing.

In stark contrast to this unprecedented accumulation of wealth, the Census Bureau released a report several weeks ago documenting the rise in poverty for millions of people.  46.2 million Americans now live in poverty, the largest absolute number of people since the Bureau began keeping records 52 years ago. In percentage terms, 15.1 percent of all Americans are living below the poverty line - which is set artificially low to begin with, defined as a mere $11,000 for an individual or $22,000 for a family of four.  These poverty thresholds were designed in the early 1960s.  Furthermore, the Bureau doesn't even count certain things as income, such as food stamps and tax credits.  If these were included, the number of people below the poverty line would be far higher.

On a final note, the child poverty rate is 22 percent nationwide - more than 1 in every 5 children - and in some urban areas like Detroit, it's over 50 percent.

Such is the state of American capitalism in 2011... draw your own conclusions.

8Sep/110

Trotsky’s response to the Republican candidates’ debate

Republican presidential debate

The Republican party is an intellectually bankrupt party.  Rather than give a detailed rebuttal as to each and every idiotic and nonsensical point the eight candidates made on stage in the Republican presidential debate Wednesday night, I will instead post some closing remarks from a speech that Leon Trotsky gave in 1932 to a group of students in Copenhagen.  Trotsky's remarks are as dazzling in their rhetoric as they are powerful and penetrating in their analysis; he condemns the entire "free market" system of capitalism and explains why the alternative (socialism) is a historic necessity.  It makes the Republicans look, in stark contrast, like children.  His speech is entitled, "In Defense of the October Revolution."

"Capitalism has outlived itself as a world system. It has ceased to fulfill its essential functions, the raising of the level of human power and human wealth.  Humanity cannot remain stagnant at the level which it has reached.  Only a powerful increase in productive force and a sound, planned, that is, Socialist organization of production and distribution can assure humanity – all humanity – of a decent standard of life and at the same time give it the precious feeling of freedom with respect to its own economy.  Freedom in two senses – first of all man will no longer be compelled to devote the greater part of his life to physical toil.  Second, he will no longer be dependent on the laws of the market, that is, on the blind and obscure forces which work behind his back.  He will build his economy freely, according to plan, with compass in hand. This time it is a question of subjecting the anatomy of society to the X-ray through and through, of disclosing all its secrets and subjecting all its functions to the reason and the will of collective humanity.  In this sense, Socialism must become a new step in the historical advance of mankind.  Before our ancestor, who first armed himself with a stone axe, the whole of nature represented a conspiracy of secret and hostile forces.  Since then, the natural sciences, hand in hand with practical technology, have illuminated nature down to its most secret depths.  By means of electrical energy, the physicist passes judgment on the nucleus of the atom.  The hour is not far when science will easily solve the task of the alchemists, and turn manure into gold and gold into manure.  Where the demons and furies of nature once raged, now reigns ever more courageously the industrious will of man.

But while he wrestled victoriously with nature, man built up his relations to order men blindly almost like the bee or the ant.  Slowly and very haltingly he approached the problems of human society. He began with religion and passed on to politics.  The Reformation represented the first victory of bourgeois individualism and rationalism in a domain which had been ruled by dead tradition.  From the Church, critical thought went on to the State.  Born in the struggle with absolutism and the medieval estates, the doctrine of the sovereignty of the people and of the rights of man and the citizen grew stronger.  Thus arose the system of parliamentarianism.  Critical thought penetrated into the domain of government administration.  The political rationalism of democracy was the highest achievement of the revolutionary bourgeoisie.

But between nature and the State stands economic life.  Technical science liberated man from the tyranny of the old elements – earth, water, fire and air – only to subject him to its own tyranny.  Man ceased to be a slave to nature, to become a slave to the machine, and still worse, a slave to supply and demand. The present world crisis testifies in especially tragic fashion how man, who dives to the bottom of the ocean, who rises up to the stratosphere, who converses on invisible waves with the Antipodes, how this proud and daring ruler of nature remains a slave to the blind forces of his own economy.  The historical task of our epoch consists in replacing the uncontrolled play of the market by reasonable planning, in disciplining the forces of production, compelling them to work together in harmony and obediently serve the needs of mankind.  Only on this new social basis will man be able to stretch his weary limbs and – every man and every woman, not only a selected few – become a citizen with full power in the realm of thought.

But this is not yet the end of the road.  No, it is only the beginning.  Man calls himself the crown of creation.  He has a certain right to that claim.  But who has asserted that present-day man is the last and highest representative of the species homo sapiens?  No, physically as well as spiritually he is very far from perfection, prematurely born biologically, with feeble thought, and has not produced any new organic equilibrium.

It is true that humanity has more than once brought forth giants of thought and action, who tower over their contemporaries like summits in a chain of mountains.  The human race has a right to be proud of its Aristotle, Shakespeare, Darwin, Beethoven, Goethe, Marx, Edison, and Lenin.  But why are they so rare?  Above all, because almost without exception, they came out of the upper and middle classes.  Apart from rare exceptions, the sparks of genius in the suppressed depths of the people are choked before they can burst into flame. But also because the process of creating, developing and educating a human being have been and remain essentially a matter of chance not illuminated by theory and practice, not subjected to consciousness and will.

Anthropology, biology, physiology and psychology have accumulated mountains of material to raise up before mankind in their full scope the tasks of perfecting and developing body and spirit.  Psychoanalysis, with the inspired hand of Sigmund Freud, has lifted the cover of the well which is poetically called the “soul.”  And what has been revealed?  Our conscious thought is only a small part of the work of the dark psychic forces.  Learned divers descend to the bottom of the ocean and there take photographs of mysterious fishes.  Human thought, descending to the bottom of its own psychic sources, must shed light on the most mysterious driving forces of the soul and subject them to reason and to will.

Once he has done with the anarchic forces of his own society, man will set to work on himself, in the pestle and the retort of the chemist.  For the first time mankind will regard itself as raw material, or at best as a physical and psychic semi-finished product.  Socialism will mean a leap from the realm of necessity into the realm of freedom in this sense also, that the man of today, with all his contradictions and lack of harmony, will open the road for a new and happier race."

5Sep/110

What if the government created 20 million jobs?

Time magazine cover

The U.S. added no new jobs in August, after a tiny private sector gain of 17,000 was completely erased by the loss of 17,000 government jobs last month.  Adding to the problem, job creation for the past two months was revised downward.  The Department of Labor said that only 85,000 jobs were created in July instead of 117,000, and a mere 20,000 in June instead of 46,000 as previously reported.

Officially, about 14 million Americans are counted as unemployed, with the unemployment rate at 9.1 percent.  This figure, however, does not take into account unemployed workers who have given up looking for a job, nor does it indicate involuntary part-time workers (those who want full-time work but can't find it).  Adding these workers results in a much more accurate unemployment rate of 16.2 percent, or 25.3 million people.

There are only 310 million or so people in America, and many of them don't even count as part of the labor force.  As of August 2011, the U.S. labor force consists of 153.6 million workers.  This puts into perspective the 25.3 million additional people seeking jobs who cannot find them.

So in light of the fact that we seem to be steadily slipping into a catastrophic economic depression, why doesn't the government directly create jobs?  FDR did this in the 1930s, cutting unemployment in half with federal work programs like the Works Progress Administration (WPA), the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).  This was in addition to creating significant social safety nets through the Social Security System, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Despite the media hype, Obama is no FDR.  However, what would it cost for the government to actually create, say, 20 million jobs to address the situation? If each job paid $50,000 a year (for the sake of an easy calculation), this would cost the government a total of $1 trillion per year to employ all of these workers.  Sounds like a lot of money, right?  It's not.

First of all, we already spend that much - or more - on the military every single year, so there's plenty of money to be found to fund this massive jobs creation program.  The estimated 2012 budget for the Department of Defense and all related military spending is between $1 and 1.4 trillion.

Second, a lot of that money would come back to the federal government in the form of taxes.  Think about all the money that would be paid into Social Security, Medicare, and federal income taxes by those 20 million additional workers.  But that's just the immediate cost calculation, assuming this is a zero-sum game - and that's not how economics works.

More importantly, creating these jobs would boost the economy dramatically in both the short run and the longer term.  If 20 million people were suddenly employed and spending money in all sectors of the economy, all businesses would be booming.  Furthermore, we could create the jobs in vital areas of national need - repairing and building new infrastructure (roads, bridges, electric grids, pipes, etc.) as well as in healthcare and education.  Basic scientific research could also be heavily funded.  All of this would propel America economically and scientifically forward for decades to come, in addition to gainfully employing tens of millions of workers and reversing the recession.

Obama will give a jobs speech this week, and he'll probably say something about handing money over to the private sector in another stimulus or through tax cuts for businesses, in a feeble attempt to indirectly create jobs.  That, of course, will allow employers to just sit on the money, as they've already been doing for several years now.  I don't know exactly what Obama will propose, but I guarantee he won't follow in the footsteps of FDR and actually create government employment.

27Aug/110

Libya: an imperialist excursion

Imperialist NATO-led war on Libya

The prolonged military intervention in Libya is a reactionary and imperialist war crime of epic proportions, masked and distorted by pseudo-liberals and the media alike.

NATO is the nominal head of the military onslaught against Libyans; in reality this means largely the governments of the United States and France, joined by Britain and Italy, each pursuing its own strategic and economic interests in the region.  The operation has somehow been given cover by liberals as a "humanitarian" mission, with a primary purpose of removing a dictator and cultivating democracy.  Nothing could be further from the truth.

Aside from the obvious similarities between the war that the United States launched against Iraq in 2003 and the war being waged on Libya, the reactionary character of this "mission" should come as no surprise to anyone.  Capitalist regimes, backed by their own financial barons and ruling elites, are organically incapable of fostering democracy or rendering humanitarian assistance.  It's not a subjective matter of who's in charge and what decisions he or she makes.  It is objectively and historically impossible for an imperialist regime in the US, France or elsewhere to take on a progressive, revolutionary role when interfering in other regions of the world. They are driven by objective business interests.

In particular in Libya, NATO warplanes have carried out over 20,000 "sorties" (which generally means specific bombing missions).  These attacks on civilian sites have destroyed countless hospitals, schools, and homes.  They have massacred thousands of Libyan soldiers, largely young people who had no choice but were simply drafted into the Libyan military.  The overwhelming slaughter is completely unjustifiable; it's obvious that the most aggressive and militaristic nations on Earth are not at all interested in saving or protecting civilian lives.

This level of imperialist aggression has not been seen since the 1930s, when Italy invaded Ethiopia.  Germany soon turned its attention to North Africa, as well, after its carve-up of Czechoslovakia.  The shocking brutality has, if anything, only increased today with modern bombs and fighter jets that are incomparably more powerful.

Despite the rhetoric, imperialism is thoroughly incapable of anything truly progressive; the United States, France, Britain and Italy have nothing but predatory war aims.  Only the working class - in Libya and worldwide - is capable of carrying out a democratic (and ultimately socialist) revolution.

With Gaddafi's imminent downfall, these NATO countries are preparing to reap the spoils of their barbaric aggression.  Reuters noted that a post-war Libyan carve-up could "herald a bonanza for Western companies and investors." Emad Mostaque, Chief Middle East and North Africa strategist at Religare Capital Markets, called Libya a "fantastically wealthy country" with "a lot of money up for grabs."  This is perhaps the most frank and honest assessment of the agendas of these Western nations.

6Aug/110

31 Americans killed in Afghanistan attack

Chinook transport helicopter

Taliban insurgents have taken credit for shooting down a Chinook transport helicopter in Afghanistan on Saturday, killing 31 American troops and 7 Afghan commandos.  This marks the single deadliest day in the war on Afghanistan in its entire 10-year duration. Officials later said that 22 of the dead were Navy SEALs.  The helicopter was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) in Wardak Province, west of Kabul.

The attack occurred after American and NATO forces launched yet another "night raid," a tactic that American commanders praise (no doubt) as effective but Afghan officials and civilians heavily criticize.  In other words, the American forces were not exactly innocent; rather, they provoked this attack on the helicopter with their oppressive and brutal tactics against the population.

According to Captain Kirstin Massey, an assistant intelligence officer, the Tangi Valley is a stronghold for the Taliban.  The insurgents are all Afghans and mostly local residents; Massey admitted that "We don't capture any fighters who are non-Afghans."  The United States continues to occupy a foreign country and oppress the local population, which, from its perspective, is fighting to repel the foreign invaders and defend its local homeland.

Meanwhile, in Iraq, talks have begun to extend the U.S. occupation.  The Iraqi parliament agreed on Tuesday to re-negotiate the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the U.S. government to approve of the presence of American forces beyond the current Dec. 31, 2011 deadline for withdrawal.  The Obama administration is determined to remain in control of key military bases in Iraq, allowing it to guard and exploit the region's massive oil and natural gas reserves, which are currently being opened up to investment from U.S. corporations.  According to two independent scientific studies released in the past several years, the U.S. war against Iraq has slaughtered well in excess of a million people since it began in 2003.