The Socialist Menace Piercing the corporate veil of deception

9Dec/110

Obama blocks morning-after pill for minors

Plan B: The Morning-After Pill

The Food & Drug Administration (FDA), following medical experts' recommendations, was all set to remove the Bush-era restriction on the emergency contraceptive, Plan B (often referred to as the morning-after pill).  Then, on December 7, the Obama administration interfered.  The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), Kathleen Sebelius, overruled the recommendation to remove the age restriction.  This is the first time in history an HHS Secretary has overruled the FDA.

Use of Plan B is time-sensitive (hence the name, morning-after pill), and physicians are often unavailable on such short notice to write a prescription.  Thus, this move will effectively deny access to the contraceptive for minors.

This is outrageous on two levels.  First, there are the extreme cases, such as rape or incest.  If a 15-year old girl is raped, she will be unable to buy the morning-after pill without a prescription - and by the time she gets a prescription, it will likely be too late.

The outlier situations of rape and incest, of course, are the easier cases to make; many Republicans might even agree that these should be valid exceptions.  However, a broader (and more controversial) principle is at stake here:  access to birth control for all girls of every age.

The girls who are most in need of contraceptives or abortion procedures are the most vulnerable ones in society - young women, who are not old enough to be capable of raising a child, and poor women, who do not have the financial resources to raise a child.  Women who are older or more affluent will not be nearly as devastated by an unintended pregnancy.  Contraceptives may be helpful or convenient for the latter group, but they are absolutely vital as a basic human right for minors.  An unintended pregnancy can condemn a girl to poverty, placing enormous burdens on her and severely pressuring her to give up any hope of a more productive and prosperous future.

The Obama administration has deliberately blocked girls under 17 from obtaining Plan B without a prescription, once again eroding a critical civil liberty.  The consequences of this action will be catastrophic for innumerable young women.

11Apr/110

Record spending cuts include banning funding for D.C. abortions

Obama, Biden, and Boehner

Last week, there was a lot of talk in the media about a possible "government shutdown."  This meant that there if there were no agreement over a budget, a bunch of stuff would lack funding, and so it would temporarily but indefinitely close.

"Essential services" would remain open, and this category pretty much includes the entire military and police-state apparatus of the U.S. government: the Departments of Defense, State, Homeland Security, and Justice, along with the intelligence agencies like the FBI and CIA.  "Non-essential" apparently means any social services or programs that actually benefit people, such as trash collection and repairing roads in Washington, D.C.  But a shutdown was averted in a last-minute budget deal, in which the Democrats caved, as usual, and gave in to Republican demands to slash government spending dramatically.

Part of this right-wing budget includes ending all federal and local government funding for abortion services.  Republicans also want to end all funding for Planned Parenthood (even though the organization does a lot of other stuff; most of its services have nothing to do with abortion).  The budget bill guarantees that the Senate will vote on this reactionary measure, though it probably won't succeed.

While I'm on this topic, I cannot understand how anyone is against abortion.  It's one thing to argue that 8 or 9 months into a pregnancy, a woman is carrying what is more or less a human baby.  But to equate an embryo - a microscopic ball of cells - with a fully formed human is preposterous. You'd have to be fucking delusional to believe that a half dozen undifferentiated cells have the same rights as an adult human.

And Republicans aren't even consistent about it.  They claim to want "small government," but do they leave women alone as autonomous individual citizens, capable of making their own choices?  Of course not. Republicans want to use the massive machinery of government to commandeer every woman's body, deny her personal liberty, and force her to undergo 9 months of pregnancy and then labor.  At a minimum, this is emotionally traumatic; at worst, women can have serious medical complications and even die during labor.  How can any conservative approve of the government forcing a woman to go through this experience against her will?

In any case, this latest budget deal shows that Democrats, no less than Republicans, are willing to cut important social programs, a vicious attack on American workers.  Why are both parties in agreement that we need to reduce spending?  Why isn't anybody arguing for a massive increase in government spending? We clearly need to spend quite a bit more on our educational system, our health care system (like most other Western countries do), basic scientific research, public transportation and energy independence, and on many other things.

But wait - there isn't enough money for any of this?  Bullshit. They have been giving tax breaks to the rich ever since Bush took office a decade ago; that's hundreds of billions drained out of the public coffers and funneled into the private hands of a few wealthy individuals.  And now Obama has extended those tax cuts.

Nor are corporations paying their fair share.  Two-thirds of all U.S. corporations paid zero income tax from 1998 to 2005, according to the GAO.  And Republicans want to LOWER taxes on corporations?  What is lower than zero?  Plus, the military budget is out of control, yet somehow sacrosanct.  Neither party dares reduce military spending.

Both parties - Republicans and Democrats alike - are beholden to right-wing corporate interests.  They are elected by the rich to serve the interests of the rich.  Neither party deserves your vote in 2012.  The Democrats simply pretend to care about working people and at best offer a few crumbs, while the Republicans openly defend the rich and shamelessly attack workers.  Behind the illusory curtain, however, Democrats are no less the enemy.